A link is not yet evidence
A folder full of sources can still leave you unable to explain where one sentence came from.
The draft says the cinema reopened in October. The link beneath it leads to a newspaper story announcing that the cinema would reopen in October.
It is a small difference with a substantial effect. The article supports a plan. Your sentence reports an event. Somewhere between collecting the source and writing the draft, an intention has become a fact.
A working reference needs to do more than take you back to a webpage. It should make clear why that page is here and what, precisely, you are asking it to support.
Put the relationship into words
For a short local-history piece, a source note might read:
Newspaper announcement: opening planned for October. Useful for the proposed date and the owner’s stated plans. Still need evidence that the opening happened.
The note takes seconds to understand later. It preserves a limit that the bare link does not carry. You might subsequently find an event listing, photographs or a report published after the opening; those would need assessing on their own terms.
A link label can do some of this work. “Newspaper announcement of planned reopening” is more revealing than “Source” or “Click here”. Keep the longer interpretation in the surrounding sentence, particularly when a source supports only part of a claim.
The distinction between quotation, paraphrase and inference matters here. An exact quotation records the source’s words. A paraphrase records your account of those words. An inference goes further. Mark the difference in your reading notes before time makes all three feel like things you simply know.
Keep enough location to return
A homepage link rarely helps someone verify a statement buried in a report. Prefer the relevant page or document, and record a section, table or page number where that is meaningful. For material likely to change, note when you consulted it and which version you used.
Do not overbuild the system for a small piece. A linked title, publication date where available, and one sentence about relevance may be enough. Formal academic work or a large shared research project may need a reference manager and the required citation style. Markdown can hold the writing without also having to manage the entire bibliography.
Nor does a saved link preserve the linked content. Websites move, access changes, documents are revised. Where your work depends on a source, consider what record you are allowed and able to retain, rather than assuming the URL will always provide the same evidence.
Audit from the sentence backwards
Before polishing the cinema article, read the factual claims and ask what supports each one. Starting with the prose exposes gaps that a tour of the collected sources can miss. You may have ten interesting articles and still lack evidence for the reopening date.
Use two documents together when you need to compare the wording closely. Watch for modest words with large consequences: planned, estimated, some, until. Removing one can strengthen a sentence beyond its source.
Clarity’s References overview gathers links from your documents, helping you find them again. It does not establish that a source supports a claim. That relationship belongs in the writing and your judgement.
If the opening date remains unverified, the draft can say what you do know: an October opening was announced. Or it can leave the date out. Both are better editorial choices than asking a convenient link to prove more than it contains.
Find app controls and examples in the Clarity documentation
A little more room to think.
A free, local Markdown hub for Mac.
Mac app details